{"id":4006,"date":"2026-11-06T09:28:29","date_gmt":"2026-11-06T17:28:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cyber.mag212.com\/apache-ofbiz-24-09-08-46-cves-upgrade\/"},"modified":"2026-11-06T09:28:29","modified_gmt":"2026-11-06T17:28:29","slug":"apache-ofbiz-24-09-08-46-cves-upgrade","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cyber.mag212.com\/fr\/apache-ofbiz-24-09-08-46-cves-upgrade\/","title":{"rendered":"Apache OFBiz 24.09.08 Fixes 46 CVEs, Including Pre-Auth RCE and Authentication Bypasses: What to Patch and Rotate"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>MAG212 CYBER | Critical CVEs | November 6, 2026<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Apache OFBiz project has disclosed <strong>46 CVEs<\/strong> in a single announcement, all affecting every release before <strong>24.09.08<\/strong>. The advisory, posted to the oss-security mailing list on 4 November 2026, says the batch includes &#8220;some critical issues&#8221; and gives one fix: upgrade to Apache OFBiz 24.09.08. Several titles describe pre-authentication remote code execution and authentication bypass. OFBiz has been a repeated target of mass exploitation, so this batch needs prompt attention, even though no exploitation has been reported yet.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Faits cl\u00e9s<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><thead><tr><th>Article<\/th><th>D\u00e9tail<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Produit<\/strong><\/td><td>Apache OFBiz, the open-source ERP and e-commerce framework<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>CVE<\/strong><\/td><td>46, announced together on 4 November 2026<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Affect\u00e9<\/strong><\/td><td>&#8220;All versions prior to 24.09.08&#8221;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>R\u00e9parer<\/strong><\/td><td>Upgrade to Apache OFBiz 24.09.08<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Gravit\u00e9<\/strong><\/td><td>Advisory says &#8220;some critical issues&#8221;; per-CVE ratings only in individual CVE records<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Records published<\/strong><\/td><td>5 November 2026 (CVE.org)<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Extra step<\/strong><\/td><td><code data-no-translation=\"\">.\/gradlew rotateSecretKeys<\/code> for deployments affected by CVE-2026-105330<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Exploitation \/ KEV<\/strong><\/td><td>None reported for any of the 46 as of 6 November 2026<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What Apache announced<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The announcement, titled &#8220;Apache OFBiz: CVE Announcements&#8221;, was sent by Jacopo Cappellato on 4 November 2026. It is short. It says that &#8220;multiple security vulnerabilities have been identified in Apache OFBiz, including some critical issues&#8221;, lists 46 CVE IDs with one-line titles, and advises users &#8220;to upgrade to Apache OFBiz 24.09.08, which addresses these vulnerabilities.&#8221; It has no per-CVE severity, no credits and no descriptions beyond the titles.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Le <a href=\"https:\/\/ofbiz.apache.org\/security.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">OFBiz security page<\/a> lists the same 46 IDs as fixed in 24.09.08, each linked to its fix in the apache\/ofbiz-framework repository. Two fixes also touch the plugins repository: CVE-2026-92887 (ofbiz-plugins PR #408) and CVE-2026-114277 (ofbiz-plugins PR #454 plus framework PR #2383). The security page gives no titles, severities or credits.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Severity and credits live in the individual CVE records, which went public on 5 November. The records we checked use Apache&#8217;s text ratings (&#8220;important&#8221;, &#8220;moderate&#8221;) and carry no CNA CVSS score and no CISA enrichment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">All 46 CVEs, grouped by type<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The titles below were extracted from the oss-security message and checked, where possible, against the published CVE records. <strong>The grouping is MAG212&#8217;s<\/strong>, based only on title wording. Apache did not group the CVEs, and a title alone does not tell you the exact preconditions. CVE-2026-97355 also causes denial of service but is listed once, under credentials.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><thead><tr><th>Group (MAG212)<\/th><th>CVE<\/th><th>Title as announced<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Unauthenticated \/ pre-auth RCE<\/td><td>CVE-2026-68524<\/td><td>Pre-Authentication Remote Code Execution via Attacker-Controlled Screen Definition Loading<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Unauthenticated \/ pre-auth RCE<\/td><td>CVE-2026-83542<\/td><td>Unauthenticated RCE via login-page widget injection<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Unauthenticated \/ pre-auth RCE<\/td><td>CVE-2026-73578<\/td><td>Unauthenticated saved-view authorization bypass with RCE impact<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Authenticated code execution<\/td><td>CVE-2026-82960<\/td><td>Widget use-when Expression Injection Bypasses Groovy Sandbox for authenticated RCE<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Authenticated code execution<\/td><td>CVE-2026-84183<\/td><td>Content Manager VIEW-only RCE in updateLayout<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Authenticated code execution<\/td><td>CVE-2026-85627<\/td><td>Authenticated Code Execution Vulnerability<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Authenticated code execution<\/td><td>CVE-2026-82912<\/td><td>Unsandboxed Groovy compiled from a service parameter<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Authenticated code execution<\/td><td>CVE-2026-82910<\/td><td>renderLink compiles link parameters as FreeMarker source<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Authenticated code execution<\/td><td>CVE-2026-82894<\/td><td>Content renderer runs a service name stored on the row<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Authenticated code execution<\/td><td>CVE-2026-71901<\/td><td>Dispatch arbitrary internal services on SFA component<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Authentication bypass \/ credentials<\/td><td>CVE-2026-105330<\/td><td>Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key in JWT Token Authentication Enables Unauthenticated Administrative Access<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Authentication bypass \/ credentials<\/td><td>CVE-2026-92887<\/td><td>REST API authentication bypassed by default when the auth attribute is omitted from a .rest.xml operation<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Authentication bypass \/ credentials<\/td><td>CVE-2026-109928<\/td><td>Incorrect Authentication Algorithm Implementation in Password Reset Enables Full Account Takeover<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Authentication bypass \/ credentials<\/td><td>CVE-2026-82907<\/td><td>externalLoginKey honoured pre-auth, reusable and unbound<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Authentication bypass \/ credentials<\/td><td>CVE-2026-97356<\/td><td>Insufficiently Protected Credentials in ViewFile Enable Authentication Bypass<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Authentication bypass \/ credentials<\/td><td>CVE-2026-97355<\/td><td>Hard-coded Credentials in AdminServer Enable Unauthenticated Denial of Service<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Authentication bypass \/ credentials<\/td><td>CVE-2026-84728<\/td><td>Cross-tenant authorization bypass in mapped-domain login<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Authentication bypass \/ credentials<\/td><td>CVE-2026-114277<\/td><td>Janrain Engage Social Login Improperly Binds External Identities to Local Accounts<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Unauthenticated view bypass \/ disclosure<\/td><td>CVE-2026-73577<\/td><td>Unauthenticated path-suffix view authorization bypass<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Unauthenticated view bypass \/ disclosure<\/td><td>CVE-2026-73580<\/td><td>Unauthenticated HR organization and employee disclosure<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Unauthenticated view bypass \/ disclosure<\/td><td>CVE-2026-83538<\/td><td>Unauthenticated disclosure through HR, Catalog, and Order Manager helpers<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>SQL injection<\/td><td>CVE-2026-81815<\/td><td>SQL injection &#8211; performFind ignore-case values, MySQL\/MariaDB<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>XML external entity<\/td><td>CVE-2026-81816<\/td><td>XML external entity injection (XXE)<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>SSRF \/ server-side fetch<\/td><td>CVE-2026-81828<\/td><td>Server-side request forgery in SurveyWrapper<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>SSRF \/ server-side fetch<\/td><td>CVE-2026-82902<\/td><td>Unfiltered server-side URL fetch in webtools viewdatafile<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Path traversal \/ file write<\/td><td>CVE-2026-66903<\/td><td>Authenticated Path Traversal in Catalog Image Management<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Path traversal \/ file write<\/td><td>CVE-2026-76150<\/td><td>Authenticated path traversal and missing authorization check in replaceImageToExistImage<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Path traversal \/ file write<\/td><td>CVE-2026-76152<\/td><td>Authenticated path traversal and missing authorization check in imageCrop and imageRotate services<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Path traversal \/ file write<\/td><td>CVE-2026-82916<\/td><td>webtools xmldsdump exports any entity to any path<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Cross-site scripting<\/td><td>CVE-2026-114229<\/td><td>Reflected Cross-site Scripting in Catalog Image Viewer Enables Script Execution in a User Session<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Denial of service<\/td><td>CVE-2026-74841<\/td><td>Denial of Service via unauthenticated userTenantId in multitenant mode<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Denial of service<\/td><td>CVE-2026-82904<\/td><td>Unbounded multi-form row count from a parameter name<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Missing authorization \/ business logic<\/td><td>CVE-2026-81734<\/td><td>Missing authorization &#8211; catalog quick-admin product writes<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Missing authorization \/ business logic<\/td><td>CVE-2026-81744<\/td><td>Authorization bypass &#8211; self-grant content OWNER<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Missing authorization \/ business logic<\/td><td>CVE-2026-81808<\/td><td>Missing authorization &#8211; search-result bulk catalog mutation<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Missing authorization \/ business logic<\/td><td>CVE-2026-100168<\/td><td>Missing Authorization vulnerability<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Missing authorization \/ business logic<\/td><td>CVE-2026-100228<\/td><td>Improper Input Validation in Order Returns Enables Unauthorized Refund Price Manipulation<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Missing authorization \/ business logic<\/td><td>CVE-2026-105325<\/td><td>Missing authorization in payment application services allows view-only users to modify payment allocations<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Missing authorization \/ business logic<\/td><td>CVE-2026-105461<\/td><td>Missing authorization in updateOrderItems allows view-only users to modify order prices and quantities<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Missing authorization \/ business logic<\/td><td>CVE-2026-109129<\/td><td>Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in OrderServices Enables Unauthorized Payment Preference Modification<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Missing authorization \/ business logic<\/td><td>CVE-2026-109837<\/td><td>Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in Order Returns Enables Cross-Party OrderItem Association<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Missing authorization \/ business logic<\/td><td>CVE-2026-109856<\/td><td>Missing Authorization in Financial Account Services Enables Unauthorized Balance Manipulation<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Missing authorization \/ business logic<\/td><td>CVE-2026-114233<\/td><td>Incorrect Privilege Assignment in Order Manager Enables Unauthorized Modification of Approved Orders<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Missing authorization \/ business logic<\/td><td>CVE-2026-114235<\/td><td>Direct Request in Order Manager Enables Unauthorized Tracking Number Modification<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Missing authorization \/ business logic<\/td><td>CVE-2026-114271<\/td><td>Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in Shopping Lists Enables Cross-Party Shopping List Modification<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Missing authorization \/ business logic<\/td><td>CVE-2026-114272<\/td><td>Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in Content Viewing Enables Unauthorized Content Disclosure<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The largest group, 14 missing-authorization and business-logic flaws, matters more in an ERP than the label suggests. Several titles describe view-only users changing payment allocations, order prices, refund amounts or financial account balances.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The four CVE records with published detail<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">We retrieved four of the 46 records from CVE.org. All were published on 5 November 2026 and none has a CVSS score or a CISA enrichment container.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">CVE-2026-105330: hard-coded JWT key (moderate)<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A forged JWT signed with the factory-default <code data-no-translation=\"\">security.token.key<\/code> gives an <strong>unauthenticated network attacker full administrative access<\/strong>. The conditions are narrow. The flaw applies to deployments that were upgraded from a release predating the earlier CVE-2026-31986 fix, kept their existing <code data-no-translation=\"\">security.properties<\/code>, and have <code data-no-translation=\"\">security.internal.sso.enabled<\/code> set to true. The record lists affected versions as 24.09.06 and 24.09.07.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The important detail: <strong>upgrading alone does not replace a key that is already set.<\/strong> Affected deployments must also run <code data-no-translation=\"\">.\/gradlew rotateSecretKeys<\/code>. Apache rates it &#8220;moderate&#8221; (CWE-321). Credit: L1nq (github.com\/L1nq0).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">CVE-2026-92887: REST API authentication off by default (important)<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In OFBiz through 24.09.07, <code data-no-translation=\"\">ModelApiReader<\/code> treats a missing <code data-no-translation=\"\">auth<\/code> attribute in a <code data-no-translation=\"\">.rest.xml<\/code> operation as false, although <code data-no-translation=\"\">rest-api.xsd<\/code> defines the default as true. A remote unauthenticated attacker can therefore call those REST operations without credentials. Rated &#8220;important&#8221; (CWE-306, CWE-1188). Credit: Wanxin Yin (yaklang.io).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">CVE-2026-109928: password-reset token gives a full session (important)<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In 24.09 before 24.09.08, an attacker who holds a user&#8217;s password-reset token can submit it to the login endpoint and get a full session, including an administrator session if the target is an admin. The record gives intercepted email, exposed logs and a man-in-the-middle on mail transport as ways a token might leak. Rated &#8220;important&#8221; (CWE-303). Credit: CyberLeo (Independent Security Researcher).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">CVE-2026-81815: SQL injection on MySQL\/MariaDB (important)<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The generic <code data-no-translation=\"\">performFind<\/code> service is affected on MySQL and MariaDB. A remote unauthenticated attacker sends an ignore-case find (for example <code data-no-translation=\"\">_ic=Y<\/code>) with a crafted backslash-terminated value. <code data-no-translation=\"\">SqlJdbcUtil.addValueSingle<\/code> escapes only single quotes, so the value breaks out of the string literal and turns the WHERE clause into a tautology, exposing arbitrary rows of the queried entity. The default Derby datasource and PostgreSQL are not affected. Rated &#8220;important&#8221; (CWE-89). Credits: n0mi1k (reporter) and Krishna Uprit (remediation developer).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Ce que nous ne savons pas encore<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Severity, CWE and credits for the other 42 CVEs had not been retrieved at the time of writing; the records for CVE-2026-68524 and CVE-2026-83542 were not yet available through the CVE.org API. So it is not yet confirmed which CVEs Apache rated &#8220;critical&#8221;. Treat the three titles describing unauthenticated RCE as the highest priority until the records say otherwise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">We found <strong>no reports of in-the-wild exploitation<\/strong> et <strong>no CISA KEV listing<\/strong> for any of the 46. Searches turned up only aggregator pages about earlier 2026 OFBiz CVEs, such as CVE-2026-31986, CVE-2026-45434, CVE-2026-47342 and CVE-2026-50223.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Why OFBiz batches get attention<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">OFBiz has a documented exploitation history:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>December 2023:<\/strong> CVE-2023-51467 (CVSS 9.8), an authentication bypass that sidestepped the fix for CVE-2023-49070, was fixed in 18.12.11. Threat actors were seen attempting exploitation and VulnCheck published a proof of concept.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>2024:<\/strong> CVE-2024-32113 was exploited and used to deploy the Mirai botnet. CVE-2024-38856 (CVSS 9.8, pre-auth RCE), found by SonicWall while testing the CVE-2024-36104 patch and fixed in 18.12.15, saw &#8220;pretty widespread exploitation attempts&#8221; against about 16% of SonicWall&#8217;s customer base. CISA added it to KEV with a federal deadline of 17 September 2024.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>September 2024 to February 2025:<\/strong> CVE-2024-45195, an unauthenticated forced-browsing RCE reported by Rapid7&#8217;s Ryan Emmons, bypassed the earlier fixes and was patched in 18.12.16. CISA added it to KEV on 4 February 2025.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">CVE-2020-9496 is another previously exploited OFBiz flaw. The pattern is clear: once proof-of-concept code appears, OFBiz instances get scanned.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How to upgrade and harden<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Restrict access first.<\/strong> Limit the OFBiz web interface, <code data-no-translation=\"\">webtools<\/code> and REST endpoints to trusted networks or a VPN while you prepare the upgrade.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Back up.<\/strong> Take a full backup of the database, <code data-no-translation=\"\">security.properties<\/code> and any customized configuration and plugins, so you can roll back.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Upgrade to 24.09.08.<\/strong> It is the only fix Apache gives. Include the plugins component, since two fixes (CVE-2026-92887 and CVE-2026-114277) touch ofbiz-plugins.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Rotate secret keys where applicable.<\/strong> If you upgraded from a release that predates the CVE-2026-31986 fix, kept your existing <code data-no-translation=\"\">security.properties<\/code>, and have internal SSO enabled, run:<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<pre class=\"wp-block-code\" data-no-translation=\"\"><code data-no-translation=\"\">.\/gradlew rotateSecretKeys<\/code><\/pre>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Verify.<\/strong> Confirm the running version is 24.09.08, check that <code data-no-translation=\"\">security.internal.sso.enabled<\/code> and the token key are what you expect, and review your <code data-no-translation=\"\">.rest.xml<\/code> files so every operation declares <code data-no-translation=\"\">auth<\/code> explicitly.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Review logs.<\/strong> Look for unusual REST calls, unexpected admin sessions and password-reset activity, and check for unknown files under image and content paths.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If you run MySQL or MariaDB, prioritize CVE-2026-81815. If you use Janrain social login or multitenant mode, review the related CVEs closely.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Foire aux questions<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Which Apache OFBiz version fixes the 46 CVEs?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Apache OFBiz 24.09.08. The advisory says all versions before 24.09.08 are affected.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Is upgrading enough?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For most deployments, yes. Deployments affected by CVE-2026-105330 must also run <code data-no-translation=\"\">.\/gradlew rotateSecretKeys<\/code>, because upgrading does not replace a <code data-no-translation=\"\">security.token.key<\/code> that is already set.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Are any of these OFBiz CVEs being exploited?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">No exploitation or KEV listing had been reported for any of the 46 as of 6 November 2026. OFBiz flaws have been exploited quickly in the past, so don&#8217;t wait.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Which CVEs are rated critical?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The advisory says &#8220;some critical issues&#8221; but does not say which. The four records we checked are rated &#8220;important&#8221; or &#8220;moderate&#8221;; the others had not been retrieved.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Sources<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.openwall.com\/lists\/oss-security\/2026\/11\/04\/9\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">oss-security: Apache OFBiz CVE Announcements (4 Nov 2026)<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/ofbiz.apache.org\/security.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Apache OFBiz security page<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/cveawg.mitre.org\/api\/cve\/CVE-2026-105330\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">CVE record: CVE-2026-105330<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/cveawg.mitre.org\/api\/cve\/CVE-2026-92887\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">CVE record: CVE-2026-92887<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/cveawg.mitre.org\/api\/cve\/CVE-2026-109928\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">CVE record: CVE-2026-109928<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/cveawg.mitre.org\/api\/cve\/CVE-2026-81815\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">CVE record: CVE-2026-81815<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.darkreading.com\/threat-intelligence\/cisa-highlights-apache-ofbiz-flaw-after-poc-open-access\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Dark Reading: CISA highlights Apache OFBiz flaw<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/thehackernews.com\/2025\/02\/cisa-adds-four-actively-exploited.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">The Hacker News: CISA adds four actively exploited flaws (Feb 2025)<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This article expands a story from the <a href=\"https:\/\/cyber.mag212.com\/fr\/the-cold-chain-is-now-a-target-mag212-cyber-daily-november-6-2026\/\">MAG212 CYBER Daily, 6 November 2026<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-buttons is-layout-flex wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-button\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link wp-element-button\" href=\"https:\/\/cyber.mag212.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/MAG212_CYBER_Daily_2026-11-06-1.pdf\">Lire le magazine complet (PDF) \u2192<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Apache OFBiz announced 46 CVEs on 4 November 2026, all fixed in 24.09.08. The full list by type, what the published CVE records say about the JWT key, REST API, password-reset and SQL injection flaws, and how to upgrade and rotate secrets.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3999,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19,14],"tags":[212,219,220,218,107,106],"class_list":["post-4006","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-critical-cves","category-vulnerabilities","tag-apache-ofbiz","tag-cve-2026-105330","tag-erp-security","tag-ofbiz-24-09-08","tag-patch-management","tag-vulnerabilities"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cyber.mag212.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4006","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cyber.mag212.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cyber.mag212.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cyber.mag212.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cyber.mag212.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4006"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cyber.mag212.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4006\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cyber.mag212.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3999"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cyber.mag212.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4006"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cyber.mag212.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4006"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cyber.mag212.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4006"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}